Skip Navigation
 

Bad News For Homeowners And Lenders!

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

Christmas comes early for Centrica investors

Published in Property & Home on 29 July 2008

The Crosby report -- a review of the UK mortgage market -- came out on Tuesday morning. It makes grim reading for property owners and investors.

According to figures released on Tuesday by the Bank of England, the future looks increasingly bleak for British homeowners and lenders.

Property sales tumble again

The Bank of England revealed that a mere 36,000 homebuyer mortgages were approved in June. This figure has fallen for fourteen months in a row and is now the lowest since the bank began producing this monthly series in 1993.

Furthermore, the next set of figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders will probably be the worst on record since mid-1974. So, forget the last property crash, because things are as bad as they were in the early Seventies! (Many thanks to property guru and Fool hero globalarbtrader for analysing these data in this excellent post.)

What’s up with mortgage lending?

The big problem is that the market for residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) is effectively dead. This involves lenders packaging up bundles of mortgages and selling them on to investors in the form of bonds, a process known as ‘securitisation’. Until last year, (mostly overseas) investors such as fund managers, insurance companies and other banks were very keen on the high yields (income) paid by these bonds.

Then the credit crunch happened, confidence was lost, and buyers of RMBS went on strike. As a result, one of the key props for the property market was pulled away, leaving banks badly short of funds to lend to companies and individuals. (For the record, UK banks have issued fifty times as much RMBS as building societies. This explains why banks, not building societies, are in line for most of the mortgage agony!)

Desperately seeking solutions: the Crosby report

Having promised ‘no more return to boom and bust’ while Chancellor, Prime Minister Gordon Brown is desperate to avoid a full-blown property crash on his watch. Hence, in April, Chancellor Alistair Darling asked Sir James Crosby, deputy chairman of the Financial Services Authority and former chairman of HBOS, to conduct a review of the outlook for mortgage financing.

This morning saw the publication of Crosby’s interim analysis into mortgage finance (the final report is expected in October). In forty pages, the report explains that there are no quick fixes to be found, and the situation is unlikely to improve in the immediate future. Indeed, it warns that it will take years for banks to adjust to this new era of lower leverage, and levels of new lending will remain low well into 2010.

The Crosby report suggests the creation of one or more ‘gold standards’ for issuers of these securities. This could increase transparency and simplicity. Another option would be to set up an exchange to allow these bonds to be priced and traded in a similar fashion to shares. However, improved market efficiencies alone would not be enough to reproduce previous levels of demand for RMBS.

Another proposal would be to broaden the Bank of England’s Special Liquidity Scheme, which allows lenders to exchange existing RMBS for more liquid government bonds. However, extending this £50 billion scheme to include new issues of RMBS, while improving liquidity, could expose the Bank to financial and legal risks. Another non-starter, perhaps?

The new reality: lower lending and higher rates

At present, mortgage-backed securities simply aren’t attractive enough to investors, who have had their fingers burned by the collapse of existing bonds. One way to improve the appeal of these packages of mortgages would be to bump up their yield. However, this would involve a significant rise in mortgage rates, which would have to go up by about a quarter (25%) to, say, 7.5% a year.

Of course, higher funding costs for mortgage lenders mean higher prices or lower availability for borrowers. This would be a disaster for mortgage borrowers and the wider property market, so big leaps in mortgage rates are unlikely to happen without a serious property slump.

Another option would be to improve the quality of mortgages that are bundled into bonds. For example, lenders may decide to securitise only prime mortgages from borrowers with deposits of, say, 25% or more. Alas, this would prevent loans to first-time buyers, subprime buyers and buy-to-let investors from being sold on.

Thus, improving the asset quality of RMBS would mean excluding borrowers who, until this year, accounted for a large slice of the overall market. These ‘fringe’ borrowers would be forced to pay much higher interest rates, reflecting their raised risk profile. Again, pinning our hopes solely on home-movers would still leave the property market firmly in the doldrums.

Let’s leave the government out of this!

Happily, the Crosby report expresses caution about proposals to set up a government-sponsored agency to guarantee mortgage-backed securities. Given the near-collapse and Federal rescue of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (which guarantee over $5 trillion of US mortgages, or almost half of all home loans), I’m relieved that this is one American model which won’t make it across the Atlantic. After all, why should taxpayers take the risks, after bank shareholders have taken all the gains?

As Sir James remarks at the end of his letter to the chancellor, “...I should stress that I may yet recommend that the Government should not intervene in the market, on the grounds that such intervention would create more problems than it would solve.”

So, it seems certain that the mortgage market will be left to heal itself, and it will be several years before mortgage securitisation can resume at anything like its former levels. In other words, we can look forward to more of the same from the credit crunch, with no let-up this year or next.

The end of millennial madness

In my view, the credit crunch is no short-term difficulty that can be solved with a quick fix. As Sir James remarks, “...a significant and prolonged shortage of mortgage finance must take its toll of both [the housing market and consumer spending].” Indeed, this may well be the worst financial crisis the UK has faced since the dark days of the Seventies.

Hence, I stick by my prediction that house prices will fall around three-tenths (30%) from their peak last year. Thanks to a global re-pricing of risk, falling asset prices and reduced liquidity, the UK will soon see double-digit yearly drops in property values, which will continue into, and even beyond, 2010. This will lead to rising job losses and, possibly, a sharp fall in economic output, leading to a recession.

So, get your personal finances in order now, before it’s too late to batten down the hatches...

More: Get a market-beating mortgage via the Fool | Use This Mortgage To Crack The Credit Crunch | Take The Money And Run

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Ilovedoggies 30 Jul 2008, 1:02am

So this is good news for you, then. Not all doom and gloom.

rowlystravel 30 Jul 2008, 11:38am

You cannot privatise profit and socialise debt, that is bang out of order!! I just cant believe the banks are allowed to gamble away money and expect everyone to pick up the tab. I thought there was a rule called ''treating the customer fairly''? clearly the FSA dont read press articles these days

CunningCliff 30 Jul 2008, 11:55am

As I've made plain many times before, I sold to rent three years ago. This was because I feared for the consequences of the triple booms in house prices, mortgages and consumer credit.

Thus, sitting on the sidelines with a sizeable housing war-chest, I stand to benefit from falling house prices. Then again, so do most adults, as I explained in this article:
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/property-home/2008/05/02/house-prices-burgers-and-buffett.aspx

Indeed, a BBC survey days after this article revealed that more than seven in ten Britons would prefer house prices to be lower!

Frankly, I think a house-price slide will, in hindsight, be seen as being for the greater good.

All the best,

Cliff (Fool freelancer and shareholder)

chasbmw 30 Jul 2008, 1:50pm

The proper solution to many of our housing problems is to let the market have its way, this will give us all much lower house prices which will help first time buyers much more than any mortgage subsidy or relief from stamp duty.
It will also add to the stock of houses as those that are held for investment reasons will come back into use as houses for people to buy or rent at reasonable prices. We might start also start investing any surplus cash in real businesses rather than just bricks and mortar

Enzyme76 30 Jul 2008, 3:43pm

"Thus, sitting on the sidelines with a sizeable housing war-chest, I stand to benefit from falling house prices."

Paying rent for the last 5 years and investing in a falling market, that realy makes sence!

25% rise by 2013! Face facts, more people, less land, people living longer, people want more.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7528248.stm

TMFMotorRacer 31 Jul 2008, 9:55am

@Enzyme76 - Indeed House prices rose until quite recently, and all that time paying rent does cost you money you are not storing up against a depreciating debt (with inflation on the rise it's also deprecitaing quite fast)... I have just read you other comments on other articles - thank you for injecting a breath of fresh air into this debate and I stand by your line of a house is a home.

chasbmw 31 Jul 2008, 1:43pm

ENzyme76.

YThe report you refer to was commissioned by the housebuilders federation who to say the least have an awful lot invested in the state of the market.

I agree that theUK is a small country with limited amount of land for housing, but so were Holland and Japan and when their housing markets crashed, they stayed crashed for 10 years. With the speculative demand burnt out, they is nothing to stop demand and supply reaching equilibrium at a much lower price level.

Todays S&P report judges that prices have a further 17% to fall in addition to the estimated fall of some 9% from the peak. capital economics have predicted that house prices may not recover until the 2030s in real terms. These are scary numbers indeed.
Currently it seems to be cheaper to rent the same property rather than to buy it on a 80% mortgage.

Superskuller 31 Jul 2008, 3:56pm

Enzyme76,

House prices are a function of lending.

Predicting the direction of the housing market in isolation of the credit market is like betting on a horse by putting a pin on the starting list.

If an interest only mortgage on a property is more per month than the rent on an equivalent property (it is in my area) then renting is not dead money. Even more so as house prices fall.

Enzyme76 02 Aug 2008, 4:48pm

Once again, I will use my phrase "A house is a home".

While all you lot are wishing the market to drop, in you rubbish rented places, I ENJOY mu HOME.

Juts look back in time, it all runs in a 7 year cycle.

The unrest at the moment is centering around one thing, teh US election, once this is over and possibly the UK one when Labour get kicked out, things will rapidly pick up.

But then I am sure you will have bought your house at what you consider to be bottom price, you will then be all back again writing about how house prices are going up!

ABMorley 03 Aug 2008, 8:33am

Enzyme76 - whilst I agree it is cyclical, I'd disagree about the period. The previous "correction" was about 1990, with the trough in 1995/6, and the new high in 2007. I make that around 17 years period.

I bought a house in 1990 (just after the crash, but obviously well before the bottom) for 61000. In 1999 I had agreed to sell it for about 70000. Luckily for me some subsidence aborted the sale, and I eventually sold it in 2004 for (ISTR) 140000. I love subsidence!

I also agree that a house is a home. We bought ours in 2006. I have little doubt that had we waited we could get one like it for a lot less in five years time... but who cares.... it's worth nothing now, because we're not selling. We live in it and its value could fall to nothing and I wouldn't care (although Barclays might!).

ABMorley 03 Aug 2008, 8:34am

ps My Alfa 156 has lost 75% of its value since 2002, but you don't hear me complain. Lovely car.

GeneralDownturn 04 Aug 2008, 1:15pm

At 16:48 on August 02 2008, Enzyme76 said:

Once again, I will use my phrase "A house is a home".

While all you lot are wishing the market to drop, in you rubbish rented places, I ENJOY mu HOME.



Hi Enzyme76

I'm glad that you're enjoying your home. I rented for a little while and I have to say that I much prefer having my own place, and my wife is certainly happier. But why are you so against house prices falling? Will you never want to move up the ladder?

I'll want a bigger place in a few years for my growing family, so a house price crash would work in my favour. Sure the house I'm selling will fall in value, but the next one will fall by even more so I won't have to spend as much. Stamp duty will also be cheaper as will estate agent fees. Who wouldn't want that?

When I was renting I had a minor spat with a neighbour who was an owner occupier. He felt that his status as a homeowner gave him more right to park on the public street. Complete tosh of course, it's first-come first-served, but it illustrates the sad fact that some people who've bought a house think they're better than those that haven't.

I think these are the ones that are whingeing the loudest. Their perceived status is deflating faster than the value of their homes.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.